Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/09/27/11:09:51
On 24 Sep 1995, Myles Barrett Williams wrote:
> It's not a question of what's wrong with Emacs, rather what is wrong with
> DOS. There is no multitasking, so Emacs is not as useful for development
> as it is under Unix.
The same limitation afflicts *any* DOS-based IDE, so Emacs is as useful
in this area as the other editors. (Actually, there are some DOS editors
which allow multitasking--in fact I work with an Emacs clone which does
just that--but as they are commercial, I won't advertise them here. RMS
once suggested me to write a DOS multitasking module which will make
Emacs multitask under DOS, but I don't have enough time. Anybody?)
Anyway, the DOS port does support compiling from within the editor and
stepping through error messages, which IMHO allows you to use it as
development environment.
> 'sides, it's not helpful to advise someone to learn a new OS to remedy a
> problem that's not OS specific.
Did I advise to learn a new OS? I was talking about DOS port of Emacs;
no need to switch to another OS to use it.
- Raw text -