Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/09/27/00:33:29
> When DJGPP can write Win95 programs, it might be worthwhile to kome up with a
>Win95 editor (or at least some level of graphical equivalent). Perhaps we
>could clone some X-Windows editor (I wouldn't know, never used X).
>
>
> What else do people think. Project worthwhile, waste of time? Portability
>a big thing? Clone a different editor and then "DOS-ify" it for newbies? Use
>a graphical platform?
I'd recommend using JED (space.mit.edu:/pub/davis/jed/*); it has flexible
color syntax highlighting, a few emulations (Emacs, Brief, and EDT, but
not VI, although the latter probably wouldn't be too hard to write), a
powerful extension language, and DJGPP support (it's already a makefile
option, and JED can parse GCC messages).
-- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) | httyp!
"That's right," he said. "We're philosophers. We think, therefore we am."
-- Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_ | Geek Code 3.1 [for explanation, finger
hayden AT mankato DOT msus DOT edu]: GCS/M/S/C d- s: g+ a17 C++(+++)>++++ UL++>++++ P++
L++>+++++ E- W(-) N++(+) o+ K- w--- O M@ V-(--) PS++(+++) PE- Y(+) PGP(+) t(+)
!5 X-- R(-) tv-@ b++(+++) DI+ !D(--) G++(+++) e->+++++(*) h!>+ r-(--)>+++ y?
- Raw text -