Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1913
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!dsi.unimi.it!dm.unibo.it!despina!rossi
From:	Davide Rossi <rossi AT cs DOT unibo DOT it>
Subject:	Re: Graphics performance under v2.0
Sender:	news AT dm DOT unibo DOT it
Organization:	Department of Mathematics, University of Bologna, Italy
References:	<1995Sep5 DOT 110137 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za>
Date:	Tue, 5 Sep 1995 16:32:10 GMT
Lines:	22
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 5 Sep 1995 stwand07 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I read somebody complain recently that graphics under V2.0 (ie LibGRX 2.0)
> is (are?) really slow compared to v 1. Just how much slower are graphics
> operations, and is this caused by the DPMI host controlling paging, etc.
> or due to "beta" code that is less optimised than previously ?
> 
> Obviously programs working unders Windows is an advantage, but if
> performance suffers I'll be staying with v 1 for quite a while to 
> come!
> 
I used _far* and movedata with PixView.
I built a home page for it: check it out at
http://www.cs.unibo.it/~rossi/pixview
it is still under test (the page, I mean) so I don't know if it works...

Ciao,
	Davide.

- Raw text -