Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/08/12/20:36:44
sulyokp AT dragon DOT klte DOT hu (Sulyok Peter) writes:
> max AT alcyone DOT darkside DOT com <Erik Max Francis> wrote:
>
> > DOS programming has never been compiler-independent.
>
> I'm afraid it's only your opinion.
> If you browse include files of Borland, Microsoft, Symantec and Watcom,
> you will find the common part (i.e. common types, macros, functions)
> of these. There is a lot of commercial C library which uses this common
> part of these.
Borland and Microsoft have similar, but consistently different
interfaces. Like I said, DOS programming has always been
compiler-dependent -- by definition, since there is no official standard.
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE // uuwest!alcyone!max, max AT alcyone DOT darkside DOT com
San Jose, CA, USA // 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W // GIGO, Omega, Psi // the 4th R!
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- // kmmfa // folasade
_Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt._ // mc2? oo? Nah. // http://www.spies.com/max/
- Raw text -