Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:710
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.cic.net!infoserv.illinois.net!madison.tdsnet.com!gail.ripco.com!mambuhl
From:	mambuhl AT ripco DOT com (Martin Ambuhl)
Subject:	Replacement for inp() and
Sender:	usenet AT rci DOT ripco DOT com (Net News Admin)
Organization:	Ripco Internet BBS Chicago
Date:	Thu, 29 Jun 1995 09:43:57 GMT
Lines:	20
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

sl323 AT city DOT ac DOT uk (Mark Lewis)
in <1995Jun28 DOT 135748 DOT 8772 AT city DOT ac DOT uk> asks:

>Borland and/or Miccysoft C define the I/O functions inp() and outp().  Being
>primarily a UNIX developer, and certainly not a user of Borland or Miccysoft
>C, I'm not familiar with these functions.  DJGPP defines 3 similar functions
>in libpc.a (namely inportb(), inportw(), inportl(), along with their
>respective output equivalents).  Which of these functions should be used to
>accurately duplicate the function of inp() and outp() ?

int inp(unsigned portid) and int outp(unsigned portid) read/write bytes:
unsigned char inportb(int portid)
unsigned char outportb(int portid)

note the difference in the prototypes.

                                                                       
--
* Martin Ambuhl       net: mambuhl AT ripco DOT com
* Chicago, IL (USA)        martin DOT ambuhl AT chessboard DOT com

- Raw text -