Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:581
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!demon!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!edi.news.pipex.net!pipex!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!news.uni-c.dk!diku.dk!terra
From:	terra AT diku DOT dk (Morten Welinder)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: c++ comments
Date:	23 Jun 1995 19:07:35 GMT
Organization:	Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen
Lines:	25
Sender:	terra AT tyr DOT diku DOT dk
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 950623085435 DOT 2031A-100000 AT physics DOT ubc DOT ca> <803925756snz AT chocolat DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Nntp-Posting-Host:	odin.diku.dk
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Paul Shirley <PS AT chocolat DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> writes:

>*cpp:
>%{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} -lang-c-c++-comments

>..and from now on C++ comments are legal...

>(Time the FSF *finally* made their *&#$ minds up about this...;)

No, it's not.  It's a really bad idea since it may change the
semantics of a program.

void
main ()
{
  printf ("%d\n", 10 //* 
                  2 // 1 */
         );
}


This program should print 10, not 5.


Morten

- Raw text -