Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/06/11/03:10:59
[ I'm sorry about this minimal reply, but I absolutely, positively,
couldn't resist the last comment. ;-) ]
Kent D. Lottis (kentl AT bdc DOT cirrus DOT com) wrote:
> As to coding standards, the FAQ covers this just fine and in
> a way I REALLY like. Actually, what DJ proposes is what all
> the programmers I know already do: get a fell for the style
> used in the existing code and stick to it. A good programmer
> should be able to adapt his coding style to a body of code the
> way a good musician should be able to switch between jazz, rock,
> funk and country.
Yes!
> (Nomex underwear on)
> Formal, written coding standards are for idle middle managers
> who aren't smart enough or flexible enough to read other people's
> code.
Yes!
> (Nomex underwear off)
Methinks you want to use a different phrasing. Are you now
"mooning" the group??? ;-)
-- Darryl ("Looking for a nice, dark place to hide") Okahata
Internet: darrylo AT sr DOT hp DOT com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.
- Raw text -