Subject:	Re: Please HELP ! Where can I get 'ksh' for DOS ?
To:	JONH AT cc DOT usu DOT edu
Date:	Mon, 5 Jun 1995 09:59:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu (user alias)
From:	Christoph Kukulies <kuku AT gilberto DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Reply-To:	Christoph Kukulies <kuku AT gilberto DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>

> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 4 Jun 1995, Wonkoo Kim wrote:
> 
> > > Date: Sun, 04 Jun 95 10:18:31 -0600
> > > From: JONH AT cc DOT usu DOT edu
> > > To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
> > > Subject: Re: Please HELP ! Where can I get 'ksh' for DOS ?
> > > 
> > >    On oak.oakland.edu   I've yet to see it work right though...  :-/
> > > 
> > >  -Jon
> > 
> > Also, ms_sh*.zip may be there, which supports ksh as well AFAIK.
Which version do you mean?

I was running 2.0 (ms_sh200) for three years now and have been very satisfied
until I found out that it becomes very slow under NT with netware client
installed. Though this is primarily a MS problem (their implementation
sucks) it was a K.O. criterion for my app.

I tried to switch to ms_sh23 but this one comes in pieces, one for DOS,
one for OS/2 and one for NT.
The latter being uncompilable under NT 3.5 (at least what I found out).

The DOS binary of ms_sh23 has (in contrary to it's 2.0 predecessor) the
nasty habit of refusing to run NT (Win95) binaries in a DOS box.

(exec).

If anyone ( I believe I posted this here a while ago but it remained
unanswered) succeeded in compiling ms_sh23 for the various
platform, I'm eager to get to know.


> 
>    Yeah, that's what I was talking about...has anyone sucessfully 
> installed this?
> 
>  -Jon
> 
> 

--Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku AT gil DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de
FreeBSD blues.physik.rwth-aachen.de 2.0-BUILT-19950531 FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-1995
0531 #0: Wed May 31 06:16:35 MET DST 1995     root AT blues DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT d
e:/usr/src/sys/compile/BLUESGUS  i386

- Raw text -