Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/04/26/23:30:10
> Maybe it would allay such confusion if all elements of djgpp have the
> maint number incremented with a maintenance release, even if they haven't
> really changed. It makes sense if one thinks of the maint N number as
> the version number of djgpp "as a whole", and not just of the individual
> parts.
I usually do update go32 for each release, just to bump the number.
This time, I forgot. I can't make that change until just before
release, in case I build other applications, which would then get an
unreleased stub version number.
- Raw text -