Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/04/11/14:44:06
> And what if smartdrv /s doesn't work, because it's smartdrv.sys?
> (This is the case with IBM DOS/V 5.x.) Presumably the IOCTL interface
> will work, but.... Obviously IBM and Microsoft have somewhat
> different philosophies on this; do you know if smartdrv is the same
> across those two implementations of DOS?
I forgot to mention that pre-v4.x SmartDrive was indeed smartdrv.sys,
so smartdrv /s won't work there. If you have the .sys variety, then
the IOCTL interface will work. IBM DOS 5.x should be roughly
equivalent to MS-DOS 4.x, where SmartDrv was also .sys. I think IBM
put the same SmartDrv.sys as Microsoft, at least functionally, but I
can't be sure as I never worked under IBM PC-DOS.
- Raw text -