Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/04/04/15:10:45
On Tue, 4 Apr 1995, Bill Davidson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Apr 1995, .ASM SoftWare Systems wrote:
>
> > They are not expending great efforts to support MSDOS ;>
>
> Well, why would they? I mean, really, aren't we all flogging a dead
> horse? Sure, djgpp gives us a way to do useful work under DOS, but DOS
> IS DEAD!! Hasn't anybody noticed? Windoze is now the API of choice,
[snip chewing, swallowing, digestion and excreting of my head]
> I've been programming under DOS (in C and asm) for a few years now, but
> there just isn't any sense in it any more. (Pardon me if I don't delete
> djgpp _quite_ yet! -- *sob, sniffle*)
> (flames welcome -- tell me I'm wrong!)
> Bill Davidson
> bdavidson AT ra DOT isisnet DOT com
>
>
Tell you you are wrong ...
OK
You are wrong ...
I'll re-quote so you'll re-read:
They are not expending great efforts to support MSDOS ;>
Please note the _LAST_ _TWO_ characters on the line and the content of
the sentance itself. Get someone to help you with this.
In defense of your comments _AGAINST_ DOS:
- This is a "DOS" mailing list you voice your opinions upon.
- DOS is a microkernal.
- Chkdsk shells out of the com program I'm running (Telemate) and reports
that I have 581344 bytes free (With QEMM off so I could run Windoze /3).
- The djgpp port is intended for DOS get GCC and port it yourself for OS/2.
It works for me ...
I believe _MY_ OS of choice would either be UNIX (real) from Novell _OR_
(specifically) BSD386 - I hate Windows, I have it because some people can
only program in Visual Basic and it's not worth my time writing a Graphics
package that integrates with my FAX software myself. Thus 5M = 500K program.
A solid following for IBM's ideas went out the windowz with the introduction
of Microchannel - This does not mean Warp is poor; had they gone for FULL
Windows support _I_ _WOULD_ _HAVE_ _PURCHASED_ it, really.
I don't need Novell Unix today ... Just what I have ...
So:
- When I use djgpp program on my crummy 16-Bits OS I have 32-Bit C features.
With _MY_ 15 years programming experience (mostly in .ASM, funny eh) I don't
think I'm too far behind by using a 32-Bit compiler on a 16Bit OS than to
be part of the vbrunx00.dll crowd with thier 32-Bit whale out of water code.
Ever see:
- A Unix Extender ... that was a few years ago ... It ran DOS in a shell.
This was AT&T Unix (at that time the "Real" thing) and a common OS
extension - The only one (for a OS, file sys ext Need Not Apply) ...
- Raw text -