Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/03/13/21:58:41
> How is the new (GO32-less) djgpp likely to change matters?
> When are these two problems that you mention, likely to be solved?
> How is the arrival of Windows 95 / etc likely to change matters?
With the absense of the extender, all the issues for itnerfacing with
Windows reside in the program itself - it's just a plain DPMI program.
In theory, with the right libraries and linker (or executable
converter), you could make a pure Win32 application. The catch is
that we don't have the right libraries and executable converter, nor
do we have a resource compiler (which isn't as big a deal).
> Again: please how easy would it be to allow the new djgpp have an option to
> compile so the program runs in real mode?
That's not a djgpp issue. That's a gcc issue. If gcc produces
real-mode code in a real-mode format (or a convertible format), then
it produces real-mode code. DJGPP is about 32-bit code. If you're
doing 16-bit code, you don't need djgpp at all.
- Raw text -