Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/01/15/12:36:17
On Sat, 14 Jan 1995, Curtiss Cicco wrote:
> Are you by chance, accessing a null pointer instead of the correct
> interrupt? Whenever I see an error message with a 0 in it, the first thi
> ng I check is to see if I'm accessing the null pointer or if it's an arr
> ay that hasn't been initialized.
Yeah, actually, as happens oh so often, as soon as I posted to this, I
realized what to do. I took everything out of the interrupt vector (put
it in a badly timed, but effective while loop) and let it go. Since
interrupts were NOT disabled when this happened, I got a unsupported int
0x00, and THEN a divide by zero error. (int 0 is divide by zero.) But
now, once in every whole bunch of times when I try to exit, I get an
unsupported int 0xD. Oh well. I'm not going to worry about it unless
it happens again. :)
- Raw text -