Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/12/15/09:38:17
>>>>>mat AT ardi DOT com (Mat Hostetter) writes:
>For what it's worth, I tried the Intel-optimized gcc-2.4.0 many months
>ago and found it to be buggy. I have not yet tried the 2.5.8 version.
Right. I know that, so I *never* recommend:-) Under either djgpp environ-
ment or Unix-like OSs for PC (e.g., BSD/386, *BSD, or Linux), compiler
internal errors occur frequently, in particular, if radical optimization
options (-O3 or -O4) are specified.
gcc-i2.5.8p.tar.gz seems better, but essentially the same because it's
entirely based on Intel's original port; nonetheless I suppose the intel
version of gcc might be useful as far as the programmer is careful enough
and keeps investigating the output codes (the program must be sufficiently
tiny to do that, though).
>Well, it's not like they have a choice. That's what free software is
>all about. :-)
I agree with you ;-)
---
raraki
- Raw text -