Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/12/07/17:02:39
>
> I posed the following question recently:
>
> > > Will the assembler format in V2.0 be the same as in V1.12, besides
> > > the change in symbol naming conventions?
>
> DJ Delorie responded with:
>
> > Yes, unless you manually add debugging information to your assembler
> > sources, which very few people (if any) do.
> >
>
> From this, can I assume that the AT&T assembler format will be
> maintained in V2.0 or are there plans to use a different assembler format?
>
> Regards, Ron.
Well, as AT&T format is the definite standard for assembler sources on
U*X, and, AFAIK, the only one known to gcc and gas, I'm close to
absolutely sure that DJGPP will use AT&T format *forever*.
Hans-Bernhard Broeker
( softbrek AT pool DOT informatik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de )
( or Broeker AT axpmgr DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de )
- Raw text -