Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/04/08/21:30:04
> I expect that the future will require some form of public DPMI 1.0
> host to satisfy the masses. Charles Sandmann has mutated go32 into
> enough of a DPMI provider to run V2.0 apps, but it's not a good
> solution (one app per go32 still).
Note that Windows 3.1 is a DPMI 0.9 provider only. Who knows what
Windows 4.0 does, but I'd be willing to bet that it still has DPMI 0.9.
Does this mean that future DJGPP programs will not work in a
Windows 3.1 DOS session, because DPMI 1.0 is required?
-- Darryl Okahata
Internet: darrylo AT sr DOT hp DOT com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.
- Raw text -