Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/03/15/18:56:49
> >> * modified versions of the binaries provided in djgpp must be
> >> distributed under the terms of the GPL.
> and modified GO32's have been widely distributed with demacs and oemacs. I
> certainly would not attempt to pass off a recompiled version of a djgpp as an
> original. What I would like to do is
I'd like some clarification, too. OEmacs has been distributing a
modified go32.exe, and I've never heard any concerns about this.
However, DJ said, in a different message (referring to GO32):
No, only the binary that *I* distribute may be redistributed. That
I'm confused. If DJ feels this way, why hasn't he (you) told me about
this? [ Hmmm. Unless DJ's changed the GO32 licensing recently, GO32
*can* be distributed under the GPL, which permits redistribution of a
modified binary as long as sources are available. ]
I'm concerned, as it appears that I must still distribute a
modified GO32 with OEmacs, as the DJGPP 1.11m3 doesn't work right with
DPMI and Ctrl-Break (as the 1.11m4 update docs didn't mention anything
about any DPMI fixes, I assume that the bug is still in 1.11m4).
-- Darryl Okahata
Internet: darrylo AT sr DOT hp DOT com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.
- Raw text -