Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/03/15/11:57:47
> No, only the binary that *I* distribute may be redistributed. That
> way I know for sure what people get when they call me with problems.
I think I need a further clarification. This seems to conflict with the
statement in COPYING.DJ
>> * modified versions of the binaries provided in djgpp must be
>> distributed under the terms of the GPL.
and modified GO32's have been widely distributed with demacs and oemacs. I
certainly would not attempt to pass off a recompiled version of a djgpp as an
original. What I would like to do is
1. Recompile go32 and bind it into my application for distribution. (The
reason for wanting to not have a separate go32 is simply that it makes
installation problems more likely. I don't have a fancy install program
and I literally have customers who call for tech support because they
mistype the name of a self-extracting file on the distribution disk and
get a "bad command or file name" message.)
2. Make all the djgpp files which I have available on my BBS for free
download (this is already done.) I don't have the compiler sources and
some of the graphics stuff.
3. Offer to provide the djgpp files on disk to my customers for a nominal
copying charge.
If number 1 is objectionable, I will bind in the original go32 instead.
- Raw text -