Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/02/08/19:05:45
i guess i still don't understand why the int86 handler can't go ahead and
do a go32_dpmi_simultate_int() for the ints it doesn't expect.
at the very least, could we have another entry point for
go32_dpmi_simulate_int that would take the same args as int86? then a
macro would be trivial.
as someone porting DOS code from other compilers to the
djgpp environment, i now need to find all my int86 calls, and either figure
out which ones are supported as int86() and which need to be translated to
go32_dpmi_simulate_int(). (or, of course, translate them all)
in either case, we'd end up with a situation where both calls always work.
paul
---------------------
paul fox, pgf AT cayman DOT com (cayman systems inc. woburn, ma)
home: pgf AT foxharp DOT boston DOT ma DOT us (arlington, ma)
- Raw text -