Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/02/08/16:12:18
> > I can't think of anything better to say than "unsupported interrupt",
> > which it already says.
>
> How about: "unsupported interrupt: use go32_simulate_int instead" ?
That's not always appropriate.
> ... So the thing to do is to use int86[x] for everything except
> the interrupts go32 doesn't know about.
That also. In general, I recommend *always* using _go32_* since (1)
it's faster, and (2) there's no reliance on a particular version of
go32.
> Well, that's simple ... but not at all obvious to the casual observer.
True. Oh well. If I had time to write good documentation, I'd use it
for other things ;-)
DJ
- Raw text -