Mail Archives: djgpp/1993/03/01/09:34:35
> I got gcc 2.3.3 from net and transfer it to my pc. I use djgpp to compile
>it with no problem. The compilers are bigger than those in djgpp package.
>The object files(.o) produced by gcc 2.3.3 seem not faster or smaller than that
>by djgpp. I test the new compiler with several programs. It seems no
>problem. I don't know if this is a right way to build a new compiler.
>Could anyone give me comment ?
Do NOT try to compile two .c's with the same invokation of gcc - it
will fail.
I use "gcc -O2" to compile gcc itself. The executables I ship are
compiled with themselves and stripped.
>By the way, Should I build libgcc2, too ? How can I build libgcc1 with 'native'
>C compiler ?
You can't and shouldn't. The native libc.a that comes with djgpp has
libgcc*.a built in.
DJ
- Raw text -