Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<3.0.5.32.20030126231955.007efbd0@mail.attbi.com>
X-Sender:	phumblet AT mail DOT attbi DOT com
Date:	Sun, 26 Jan 2003 23:19:55 -0500
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
Subject:	Re: passwd/group parsing
In-Reply-To:	<20030127001952.GA1908@redhat.com>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030126182438 DOT 00805230 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030125204634 DOT 00802ad0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030125204634 DOT 00802ad0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030126182438 DOT 00805230 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Chris,

Everything looks fine. Regarding what constitutes a valid 
passwd entry, Corinna and I thought that fields 3 & 4 ought
to contain valid numbers and nothing else. Your current
test seems less strict.
One ChangeLog nit: it's string.h (not strings.h).

Pierre

- Raw text -