delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2003/01/23/21:34:04

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 21:34:05 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ARGH pthreads tests failing?
Message-ID: <20030124023405.GA1814@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030122150338 DOT GA4396 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT WNT DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0301230837570 DOT 213-100000 AT algeria DOT intern DOT net> <20030123163224 DOT GA11997 AT redhat DOT com> <20030123201039 DOT GA20854 AT redhat DOT com> <1043352929 DOT 27382 DOT 13 DOT camel AT lifelesslap> <20030124022645 DOT GA14591 AT redhat DOT com> <20030124023217 DOT GA30080 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20030124023217.GA30080@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:32:17PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:26:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 07:15:29AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>>>On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 07:10, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>>How do we proceed here?  I also get this kind of error if I build
>>>>everything from scratch and do the standard make; make check.
>>>
>>>Those errors are a result of the change to the default mutex type.  We
>>>should update the tests.
>>
>>Hmm.  After taking an exhaustive sweep over the whole testsuite and
>>eliminating all warnings (some of which were actually indicative of
>>errors), everything seems to be working ok, now.
>>
>>I'm doing my 50th testsuite run to verify this but it looks like I'll
>>be releasing 1.3.19 soon.
>
>Of course the mutex failures came back with this run.  Could they possibly
>be sporadic?

Ah.  I see the difference.  I erroneously had optimization turned on in the
last test suite run.  I turned it off and got the aforementioned errors.

Perhaps this is a hint.

cgf

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019