Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/11/16/18:29:55

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 18:30:19 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Matt <matt AT use DOT net>
Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Want to release 1.3.16
Message-ID: <>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Matt <matt AT use DOT net>, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20021115220145 DOT GA27950 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0211161455380 DOT 12738-100000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:59:58PM -0800, Matt wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Should I wait for more ntsec stuff or is it ok to release 1.3.16?
>> There are a couple of problems I'd like to get resolved in a new
>> release.
>I'd like another few days to investigate a hang I'm seeing when running
>nessus under cygwin. The nessusd and all of it's children hang in
>libkernel32  somewhere in iname. The culprit that appears to cause the
>hang is a socket accept() call in the parent process.

'iname' is just a generic name for an unknown location, isn't it?  You
never get useful symbol information from the system DLLs.

I have no idea what nessus is or why this would be considered a show
stopper.  AFAIK there hasn't been any new networking changes since


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019