Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3DB5C3C4.F57CE7B0@ieee.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:31:48 -0400
From:	"Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
X-Accept-Language:	en,pdf
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Avoiding /etc/passwd and /etc/group scans
References:	<20021021162246 DOT GC15828 AT redhat DOT com> <20021022162432 DOT GF514 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB58CBD DOT 87B2BDD8 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022181947 DOT GA4729 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5A076 DOT ABAFF076 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022191217 DOT GD4828 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5AB53 DOT B434ED90 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022202004 DOT GA6995 AT redhat DOT com> <20021022203300 DOT GC6429 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5BC04 DOT CD6587CB AT ieee DOT org> <20021022212028 DOT GG6429 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Argh.  I'd like cygwin to be always able to execute a file with an .exe
> extension. 

Who gets the x right? Everyone? 

> I don't suppose there is any way to do that short of essentially
> doing a chmod +x on the file, right?

Right.

About the shell scripts, I will look at you patch tonight.
Why do you want to be different from regular Unix and report x
just because the file starts with #! ?
Why not force the user to chmod +x the scripts, for them to be
executable?

Pierre

- Raw text -