Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/10/22/15:10:34
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:01:10PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> I'll provide you with ssh access to sources.redhat.com if you want to
>> accumulate your patches on a branch and maybe even offer your own
>> "snapshots".
>
>OK. So this branch would have the evolving ntsec stuff, but will be
>populated with stable fork/mmap/tty/etc.. code.
Right. "stable" fork/mmap/tty/etc. You'd have to be constantly merging
from the trunk.
>> I really didn't anticipate the level of difficulties that are showing up
>> in the cygwin mailing list wrt ntsec, so I'd like to get them solved.
>> I'm thinking that if we can get some stuff tested before Corinna returns
>> then maybe it will make her job a little easier.
>
>Right, I am sure she will have enough things to do. To really test it
>we need to have people use it. Thus I like the idea of having it in
>snapshots.
Another idea is to isolate all of your changes using ifdefs and I can
just turn on the ifdef in the normal snapshot process. Then you wouldn't
have to maintain a separate branch.
>> Barring that, if you could offer some assurance, on the cygwin mailing
>> list, that you're looking into the bugs, that would be helpful. Then,
>> at least, people will realize that their complaints aren't falling on
>> deaf ears.
>
>OK. But whatever changes I make can only mask the underlying problem
>with the incorrect passwd file.
Right.
>I am not sure where the incomplete passwd files are coming from.
>Old users may have files without sids.
Right. I expressed some amazement about this myself in cygwin at cygwin
and was chided for it. I didn't expect that there would be *that* many
people with passwd files lacking sids out there.
>I just looked at passwd-grp.sh.done (July 28) on my system and noticed
>that the -l switch is not given to mkpasswd/group for domain users. So
>they may have problems when they login as a local user. Similarly
>software installed as a local user won't work if the user logs in later
>as a domain user.
>
>Is there any harm in always giving the -l and -d switches? In other
>words, what happens with -d on a standalone machine? That won't solve
>everything but it is simple and better than what is in my
>passwd-grp.sh.done
Will it potentially cause a delay if we use the -d switch?
The same person who chided me was indicating that setup.exe was somehow
creating files that were incorrect or that cygwin was unable to execute
files with .exe extensions. I don't really understand what's going on.
Does it make sense that someone would have to properly generate
/etc/passwd and also turn off ntsec in order for things to work again?
- Raw text -