Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<3.0.5.32.20020929224948.00825140@h00207811519c.ne.client2.attbi.com>
X-Sender:	pierre AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com
Date:	Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:49:48 -0400
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup
	failure
In-Reply-To:	<20020929233327.GB27934@redhat.com>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929165333 DOT 0080fae0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
	<1033254454 DOT 4375 DOT 48 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929000215 DOT GB10872 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1033264646 DOT 4375 DOT 78 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929020609 DOT GB11549 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929165333 DOT 0080fae0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 07:33 PM 9/29/2002 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I also noticed that allow_ntsec == 1 on WinME,
>>which at the very least causes useless calls. 
>
>How did allow_ntsec become 1 on WinME?  That much at least should be
>easy to debug.

Right. This afternoon I had noted it was already 1 when entering
environ_init. An fgrep just revealed in security.cc
BOOL allow_ntsec = true;
I would propose a patch setting it to false at the end of environ_init
on Win9X even if it is "on" in CYGWIN. Ditto for ntea and smbntsec.
Is there a better idea out there?

>Also, another question is:  Are you sure that you are using the latest
>CVS sources?  This looks suspiciously like the problem which was just
>fixed.

I have again updated from cvs and run make. Same result in gdb.

The ChangeLog starts with
2002-09-29  Christopher Faylor  <cgf AT redhat DOT com>

	* thread.cc: Use "%E" in *_printf throughout rather than calling

thread.h has

class verifyable_object
{
public:
  long magic;

  verifyable_object (long);
  virtual ~verifyable_object ();
};


Pierre

- Raw text -