Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:31:23 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: eliminated reliance on newlib malloc
Message-ID:	<20020818033123.GA19092@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020816201318 DOT GA24942 AT redhat DOT com> <122196589420 DOT 20020817171040 AT gmx DOT net> <004f01c2460c$f0242e10$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<004f01c2460c$f0242e10$6132bc3e@BABEL>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:41:28PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I'm building a snapshot now.  I guess that will be the first step in
>>seeing just what I've broken.
>
>If you're building on cygwin, I assume you'll have noticed that sort(1)
>is now broken; it dies at malloc.cc:3644 in dlmalloc (bytes=768).
>(Sort is used in, at least, speclib, so that's why I assume you would
>notice this problem if you build cygwin.)
>
>On my machine this is an easy bug to reproduce: just running sort with
>no arguments from the command line dies immediately.  Otherwise
>everything I'm using seems fine.

This actually turns out to have been a (gulp) bug in Doug Lea's malloc.
There was a new version available which fixed the problem.  It was
fixed *today*.

Do we have a lurker in our midst or is this just synchronicity at work.

In any event, it was nice to have someone else fix the problem for me.

I'm generating a new snapshot now.

cgf

- Raw text -