Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/07/27/21:27:26

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 21:27:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: -fno-rtti
Message-ID: <>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <028701c235ac$b1c303f0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020727211653 DOT GA8923 AT redhat DOT com> <02b901c235b5$f9fdfcc0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <02ed01c235b9$7060a900$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <02ed01c235b9$7060a900$6132bc3e@BABEL>
User-Agent: Mutt/

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:03:28PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote:
>"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com> wrote:
>> Would the alternative of compiling just the cygserver with rtti
>> acceptable?  For the problem I've got (which is defining
>> operators on a class hierarchy) rolling my own code would
>> cost more in terms of space and time than the native C++ rtti.
>I've found a way of doing this w/o dynamic_cast (and w/o being too
>extremely horrible either), so I'll change over to that and avoid
>the issue.  As you said in your reply "I'd rather not make a
>conscious decision to do this when it can be avoided."  I'll go
>with that :-)

Ok.  I guess I won't admit that I was wavering then.  :-)


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019