Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D2F335C.20409@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:51:56 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8
References:	<20020711044304 DOT GA3292 AT redhat DOT com> <021001c229d2$e8f55b60$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D2F2B26 DOT 4040201 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712193712 DOT GD9546 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> 
> So, for now, I guess the only solution is to add the path to the
> Makefile along with a big flashing FIXME.


You'd still need a big flashing FIXME, but what about computing the path 
from gcc -v?

GCCVER=`(gcc -v 2>&1) | grep "^gcc version" | awk '{print $3}'`
GCCINC=-I/usr/include/c++/$(GCCVER)

> 
> I wonder why "they" are making so many tweaks to the header file stuff
> in 3.1.  It seems a little to severe to be part of a minor version
> number release.


Yep.  "They" are really pesky.

--Chuck

- Raw text -