Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/07/04/06:43:03

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <01a401c22347$d8821890$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From: "Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20020704052424 DOT GA15450 AT redhat DOT com> <00e601c2232d$a7c5be10$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP> <010001c2233f$75231360$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020704115207 DOT O21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <013801c22341$e3722430$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020704120624 DOT P21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <018801c22345$661c1ff0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020704123428 DOT Q21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Subject: Re: access port (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 11:44:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> No, it doesn't look like a real large scale patch.

Sounds good.

It also sounds like it would be a good thing to get done, for
cygserver's sake if not for other things too. Are you intending to do
this? or are you looking for volunteers?  Given I was going to do some
work for this in cygserver itself, I would be happy to implement your
suggestion in the DLL if you wanted.

Of course, this is dependent on confirmation that close-on-delete is
what is wanted for unix domain sockets.


// Conrad

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019