Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/07/04/06:06:32

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:06:24 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: access port (cygserver question) <PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE>
Message-ID: <>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020704052424 DOT GA15450 AT redhat DOT com> <00e601c2232d$a7c5be10$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP> <010001c2233f$75231360$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020704115207 DOT O21857 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <013801c22341$e3722430$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <013801c22341$e3722430$6132bc3e@BABEL>
User-Agent: Mutt/

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:02:20AM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote:
> "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> > AFAIK, they disappear after they have been closed by all apps.
> > I'm wondering if we should create these unix domain socket files
> > with the appropriate FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE flag.  This would
> > require to rearrange Egor's socket code to use CreateFile() instead
> > of _open()...
> Couldn't that code just immediately unlink the file and let the cygwin
> pending delete system handle it?

Isn't that just going out of the way of rewriting some code in a
better way?  Just calling unlink() is somewhat ugly, isn't it?


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019