Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	atacama.four-d.de: mail set sender to <tpfaff AT gmx DOT net> using -f
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:48:30 +0200 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Sommerzeit?=)
From:	Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff AT gmx DOT net>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	2 questions
Message-ID:	<Pine.WNT.4.44.0207031025010.229-100000@algeria.intern.net>
X-X-Sender:	pfaff AT antarctica DOT intern DOT net
MIME-Version:	1.0

1. Is Rob still maintaining the pthreads related stuff ?
In an other message he resigned from cygserver. Does this mean pthreads
too ? I have one patch pending that implements cancellation that has
not been reviewed yet and i have 2 others in my queue, one regarding
pthread_keys(TLS) that is IMHO neccessary if gcc will switch to posix
threads (i have already build my gcc-2.95.3-5 with posix threads and got
no problems yet) and a new mutex implementation that is more posix
compliant and makes no distinction between 9x and NT.
I would be glad to get these into the official DLL.

2. Why is my new-cygwin1.dll build from source about 100k smaller than the
official cygwin1.dll ?

Thomas

- Raw text -