Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<018e01c2123d$503f83c0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	"egor duda" <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<091e01c2120f$25e50290$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <1149904301 DOT 20020612194520 AT logos-m DOT ru> <00f201c21234$4e19d3b0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <17816532682 DOT 20020612213549 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Subject:	Re: DuplicateHandle() question
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:16:43 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Egor,

You wrote:
>  All server has to do is to return valid handle on success and 0 on
> error. It's up to client to interpret the results. Or you can make
> server return all handles in some structure so that client will have
> to call server only once. But then again, all server has to do is to
> fill this structure and it's up to client to discard all valid handles
> if at least one of returned handles is 0.

Okay, that's much the conclusion I was coming to but I wanted to make sure I
wasn't missing something. Yes: the client calls the server just once and it
returns a structure containing several handles. I was just trying to
localise the error handling at the server end but I'll follow your advice
here: if the return code (in the structure) indicates an error, the client
will have to go through it and close any valid handles in it.

Thanks for the input.

// Conrad

- Raw text -