Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:48:33 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Defining _POSIX_SEMAPHORES for cygwin
Message-ID:	<20020325164832.GF18503@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1017004992 DOT 28473 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFGEJACHAA DOT gsw AT agere DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFGEJACHAA.gsw@agere.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 08:31:59AM -0500, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
>I would like to define _POSIX_SEMAPHORES in sys/features.h
>for Cygwin. According to POSIX, you define this when you
>support the semaphore API.
>
>We are now 99% of the way to having Python thread support
>for Cygwin. I got POSIX semaphore support added to Python's
>source base and tested it with Cygwin. Now we just have to
>indicate that Cygwin has them.
>
>The API is there and appears to work correctly. Is there
>any issue with making this change?

If you think it works and Robert concurs, then we should add it.

We'll need a patch, of course:  http://cygwin.com/contrib.html .

cgf

- Raw text -