Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/01/21/23:38:08

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: ok, the daemon has had feedback...
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:38:07 -0600
Message-ID: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Christopher
> Faylor
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:47:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >which was: no impact when not running, broke tty's when running.
> >
> >I've fixed the tty issue.... so
> >
> >what next to get this accepted/further work required defined?
> Anyone actually looked at the changes and evaluated the implementation?

I haven't.  I'll see what I can see, but I'm showing up a little late to that
particular party ;-).

> I'd hoped for a little bit more actual testing, too.
> Gary, are you using this on a day-to-day basis?

No, I'm not.  In fact I have not tried Rob's tty fixes yet.  I'll do so soon.
Somebody should try this on WhyME/9x, the non-NT series seems to have the most
trouble with... well, pretty much everything.

Rob, is this branch synced with the current head, or does cvs make that
difficult until you merge back in?

Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019