Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/01/21/22:58:06

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:54:18 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ok, the daemon has had feedback...
Message-ID: <>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <08f201c1a2f7$87b914c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <08f201c1a2f7$87b914c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:47:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>which was: no impact when not running, broke tty's when running.
>I've fixed the tty issue.... so
>what next to get this accepted/further work required defined?

Anyone actually looked at the changes and evaluated the implementation?

I'd hoped for a little bit more actual testing, too.

Gary, are you using this on a day-to-day basis?


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019