delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2002/01/03/23:28:52

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <0cbc01c194d8$53f24e40$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Cc: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Subject: Daemon (again)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:28:57 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2002 04:28:46.0986 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D1086A0:01C194D8]

hey ho,
    Last time I raised this, Chris said "has anyone looked yet?"

To which the answer (my friend) is blowing in the
wind^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H... is AFAIK no.

However in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2001-q4/msg00060.html

Gary offered to look if the headache of changing is not too big.

Gary, can I ask you to put setup aside for a little bit (It's now
feature frozen bar my install-all feature) and review the daemon?
Cygwin1.dll is nice and stable just now, so this would be an ideal time
to add in the core of the daemon (the daemon itself, and Egors' security
fix, but not IPC).

I've merged CVS so it's up to date, it looks ok - I've done a test
build.

Remember, if you want to test the IPC, newlib needs a patch as well.

Rob



- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019