Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:23:58 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe command line options
Message-ID:	<20011031192358.A28898@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20011031083038 DOT 86183 DOT qmail AT web9906 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1004521251 DOT 1121 DOT 2 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <002401c16250$cbd9f850$f35a3c3e AT Obsession> <20011031165822 DOT C10999 AT redhat DOT com> <1004569224 DOT 1121 DOT 155 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1004569224.1121.155.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:00:23AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> I'd appreciate it if the current argv code was reverted ASAP.  We can't
>> use the cygwin argv stuff in setup.exe.
>
>Why not? It's been cleanly extracted, and is (one way) GPL compatible.

We've tried (or at least I've tried) to keep the two source bases
separate.  If random bits of cygwin, which we care about, start showing
up in other projects that we really don't care about then it is just
more of a headache to keep track of.

Then there is also the technical reason that we don't need it since
__argv seems to do what we need automatically.  Just include stdlib.h
and you have the parsed command line available.

cgf

- Raw text -