Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:13:32 +0400
From:	egor duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.53 RC/4)
Reply-To:	egor duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	deo
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<187255818497.20011008121332@logos-m.ru>
To:	Christopher Faylor <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: close to 1.3.4
In-Reply-To:	<20011005210557.A14091@redhat.com>
References:	<20011003000628 DOT A28762 AT redhat DOT com>
	<7317101690 DOT 20011005175451 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20011005175404 DOT A13034 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20011005210557 DOT A14091 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Saturday, 06 October, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:

CF> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 05:54:04PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 05:54:51PM +0400, egor duda wrote:
>>>Wednesday, 03 October, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:
>>>CF> I'm a little reluctant to release 1.3.4 without Corinna's stabilizing
>>>CF> presence but if no one has any objections, I'll probably do this in
>>>CF> the next couple of days.
>>>
>>>i get a bunch of "mark_closed: attempt to close protected handle" in
>>>'expect' while running gas testsuite. i don't know if it indicates a
>>>real problem, but i'm looking at it now.
>>
>>So far, I haven't been able to duplicate this.  I'm trying again with various
>>CYGWIN= settings.

CF> Ok, I duplicated it with CYGWIN=tty ntsec.

oh, i should have told what options i'm using from the beginning. will
certainly do next time.

CF>  I think I've checked in a fix for the problem.

i wonder if such things should be a bit more "intrusive" in debugging
version, i.e. should we call api_fatal on errors in add_handle and/or
mark closed? if we do, i'd be easier to write test-cases for such
problems. it won't affect normal users, since releases are built with
debugging code disabled.

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -