delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/10/03/21:21:06

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <04b201c14c73$12b6bb80$01000001@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: C++ templates and cygwin?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:22:40 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Chris,
    Whats your opinion on c++ template use within Cygwin. I'm not
necessarily talking the STL, just that for things like lists, derived
classes don't really suite, and recoding list traversal for the nth time
is kinda... well boring.

Also abstracting the code up one level does allow future replacement of
the list with b* trees/hash tables etc wit more ease. (And for some of
the stuff in progress that _may_ become desireable.)

Rob

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019