delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: fixup_after_fork_not? |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 |
Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:31:52 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F140@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
Thread-Topic: | fixup_after_fork_not? |
Thread-Index: | AcE5jLGsAHZ2UUZmQum1pswqbqJzkQAAp7qw |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id UAA27964 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > > I'm pretty sure that the fork fixup routines are running. If > they weren't > then fork wouldn't be operational. sure :]. Its the only-shows-output-when-exec-occurs-from-tcsh that has me intrigued. > You do have to make sure that you call anything which uses > malloc at the > proper point or some things (like mutos) won't be properly > initialized. does system_printf use malloc? Otherwise what I'm doing is pretty basic. (win32 CreateMutex call and a list iteration.). > I've just reduced the size of the problematic 'zombies' > array. I don't know > if that is what is causing your size problems but it should > make the DLL > noticeably smaller. Thanks. When I get home I'll give feedback. > If you can't, for some reason, debug a DLL that is entirely > built with -g, > try compiling everything except fork.cc and thread.c (or > whatever) with '-O2' > and those to files with '-g'. > > You are using the latest version of binutils, right? No, I'm still using the cross-compile toolkit I setup a while back. Do I need to update that for correct functionality? Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |