Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:21:39 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: fork on win95
Message-ID:	<20010720202139.A14123@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<005101c11036$06368800$806410ac AT local> <20010719131210 DOT Y730 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010720201647 DOT A14063 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20010720201647.A14063@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.19i

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:16:47PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>The whole output is generated three times just with different handle
>>values (stdin, stdout and stderr, probably). Then the normal `ps' output
>>appears. Generally, the above ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE output appears,
>>then everything works fine. That's also valid for the aforementioned
>>ssh session. As usual nothing happens when started under strace control.
>
>Out of curiousity, have you done a "make clean all" on your DLL?  I
>noticed strange errors until I did this.  I don't really understand
>why.

Nevermind.  I've now duplicated this one, too.  I have to wonder if
I was ever actually testing the DLL that I built.

Sorry for making everyone spin their wheels.

cgf

- Raw text -