Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/07/03/10:27:08
Sorry, I spoke too soon, when I did a further net tests, I still see
incorrect package choices in the experimental.
For example using bash with "view full"
previous 2.05-6 -> 2.05-5
current 2.05-6 -> keep
Exp 2.05-6 -> 2.05-4
Note "expermental" is picking up a earler package before "previous"
At least the uninstalls have gone.....
Regards Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Forbes" <trevorforbes AT ozemail DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
>
>
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:22:01PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
> > >From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> > >> Anyone else tried this?
> > >
> > >
> > >Yes, but the last time I reported setup was good, all hell broke loose
> when
> > >it was released.....;)
> > >
> > >This one, however, has some bugs...if you select experimental then
> > >"view - full", the "new" column is full of uninstalls and some
incorrect
> > >versions. "view - partial" the same.....
> >
> > This is a pretty serious bug. I understand the uninstall. I don't
> understand
> > the "incorrect version". What is wrong with the version?
> >
> > cgf
>
> Sorry, for not being so clear..... The incorrect version I was referring
to
> was that some items were reverting to previous versions. However, your
> fixed version has corrected the bugs I reported and works fine on the
basic
> tests I did...
> Darn ...I just noticed you have made more changes....
>
> Good work to all involved....
>
> The delayed response is because I live in central Australia......
>
> Regards Trevor
>
>
>
- Raw text -