delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/06/24/08:47:13

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <002e01c0fcab$79ce1510$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>
From: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
<cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <00d201c0fc98$f49a37f0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <077a01c0fca4$acd83320$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Subject: Re: Source Only Missing in set_action() in setup.exe
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:44:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>;
<cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 04:56
Subject: Re: Source Only Missing in set_action() in setup.exe


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
> To: <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 8:28 PM
> Subject: Source Only Missing in set_action() in setup.exe
>
> > ACTION_SRC_ONLY is effectively disabled because either pkg->installed
> or
> > pkg->installed->source_exists is false when set_action() is called.
> >
> > I'd prefer to leave it that way and let source downloads and installs
> be
> > controlled by the "Src?" checkbox:
> >    For ACTION*_PREV, ACTION*_CURR, and ACTION*_TEST, the source file
> to use
> > would be the one associated with the action.
> >    For ACTION_UNINSTALL and ACTION_REDO, the currently installed
> version
> > would apply.
> >    For ACTION_SKIP, the default version would apply.
> >
> > I'd like to either gray-out or not paint the "Src?" checkbox if the
> source
> > is not available, but I'm still trying to figure out how to decide.
>
> Howabout a different approach? A global "src" button at the top of the
> package selection list. When selected source packages appear on separate
> lines. This is in line with the common unix packaging systems and would
> also allow explicit src package version choices. (Ie I might want the
> experimental squid version source, but no binary to be installed.)
>
> The src packages _could_ also be put into category Source automatically.

That sounds reasonable to me.  The current method that sort-of tacks the
source onto the binary distribution line is likely to get more awkward with
time.

I'll leave the issue alone until someone enters my patch into CVS and will
probably piggyback it onto your patch unless you act on it first.

--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019