Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/06/21/19:37:13

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <04e801c0faa2$f9008260$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: hierarchy in setup (category stuff)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:39:02 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2001 22:27:39.0278 (UTC) FILETIME=[6123AAE0:01C0FAA1]

Well, I got a little time yesterday, and I've addded multiple categories
to setup, and got the basic setup view showing:

category  current new src name
           old   new   src  name
category 2
           old   new   src  name

I now have the following questions:

1) Are there any other _inital_ actions for category other than
2) I've got two views for categorys - full and normal as per the current
layout. full shows all packages and categories. normal shows what the
current "part" layout does. But categorised. Empty categorys show up
with no children.
3) What should the inital category view be - expanded or collapsed?
4) Should category should uncategorised packages appear as?
"Uncategorised" seems singularly unappealing..


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019