Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 22 Apr 2001 22:34:06 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: SHOWSTOPPER: [was Re: vfscanf in newlib]
Message-ID:	<20010422223406.A27340@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EF0C AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <20010422202523 DOT A26689 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE39142 DOT FFA468D7 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3AE39142.FFA468D7@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:19:46PM -0400

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:19:46PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> I confess to not understanding how my version of sshd could possibly
>> have worked, given what I now understand about the problem.
>
>Well, I was just running "ssh" when I noticed the problem -- the target
>sshd server was on a 1.1.8-2 system.  (I also tried ssh-cygwin-1.3.0
>---> sshd-solaris-7).  In both cases, ssh.exe crashed.
>
>> Chuck, could you update to the latest CVS version and let us know if
>> it fixes the problem that you found.
>
>Sure.  I'm at work right now, but I plan on going home for dinner soon.
>Very soon.  It's 10:15pm EST.  8-P
>
>But I'll start the rebuild before the spaghetti.
>
>> In the meantime, I have wiped out 1.3.0 from sources.redhat.com.
>> 
>> Since a couple of people seem to be using it, I guess I should bump
>> the version to 1.3.1.  Sigh.
>
>mebbe 1.3.0-2

Yeah, I tried that with 1.1.8.  I don't like having two "official"
versions of the DLL out there.  There is no way to tell from a cygcheck
or a uname -a what DLL is being run.

I think it is safer to just bump the version.  It's a pretty cheap
thing to do technically, if not psychologically.

cgf

- Raw text -