delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/04/03/21:54:42

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:46:09 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: New output from mount.exe
Message-ID: <20010403214609.C3112@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200104020509 DOT BAA07712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010402094800 DOT B956 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <s1sn19zhgw3 DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp> <20010402110045 DOT B1000 AT redhat DOT com> <s1szodxo3em DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <s1szodxo3em.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>; from fujieda@jaist.ac.jp on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:32:49AM +0900

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:32:49AM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:00:45 -0400
>>>> Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> said:
>
>> Again, this was not the rationale for this change.  Here is the change
>> to mount.exe:
>> 
>> -  const char *format = "%-18s  %-18s  %-11s  %s\n";
>> +  const char *format = "%s on %s type %s (%s)\n";
>> 
>> I didn't reformat slashes or do anything else that was not in the
>> original version of mount.
>
>Would you like to go a step further?
>
>Corinna's idea "just printing slashes" can reduce chances for
>newbies to fail to escape backslashes on creating a new entry
>with the `mount' command. This would be fine.

It would also lie to the user about what was happening in the Cygwin
internals.  Cygwin stores these paths as c:\foo not c:/foo.  I don't see
any reason to mislead anyone about what Cygwin is really doing.

cgf

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019