delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Subject: | RE: fifos and named pipes |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:46:43 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-ID: | <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF02E2B4@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au> |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 |
Thread-Topic: | fifos and named pipes |
Thread-Index: | AcC3HaHjWr2fpkNVQViJV2zdg/zVbgAAJ3HwAACLl1A= |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>, |
<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> | |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id TAA28320 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Collins > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:33 AM > To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: fifos and named pipes > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:20 AM > > To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > > Subject: Re: fifos and named pipes > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:06:14AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > >Just thought you'd like to know: named pipes under win32 > (which I was > > >considering using for the NT implementations) don't have the same > > >semantics as under openBSD.... so I'm going with my roll-your-own > > >approach . > > > > What about regular pipes? I suggested that you could just use those > > along with some glue to duplicate handles between processes. > > I haven't tested anonymous pipes yet. Even if I do use those, > I need the > glue to identify what pipes are available first - that's what > I'm on now > (step 3 of 5). I plan to look at that once I've got a rough-and-ready > implementation going. > Speaking of the glue to see what pipe are available: can I use the cygwin shared memory area? any caveats/must dos/must not dos with doing that? Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |