Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:24:51 +0300
From:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.45) Personal
Reply-To:	Egor Duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	DEO
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<2710465067.20010320172451@logos-m.ru>
To:	Christopher Faylor <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: State of the DLL, mark 2?
In-reply-To:	<20010320091254.F32706@redhat.com>
References:	<20010319203650 DOT A30559 AT redhat DOT com>
	<907012433 DOT 20010320162719 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010320091254 DOT F32706 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Tuesday, 20 March, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:

CF> Btw, there are a lot of extra cruft that needs to be done to get this
CF> working.  I am attaching a malloc object file that you can use.

ah, that's where malloc_dbg() coming from.

CF>    I  think  you  also  have  to  remove all malloc functions from
CF> newlib's libc.a.

can  you  give a little hint here? should i strip appropriate sections
from libc.a or it's better to build newlib with -DMALLOC_PROVIDED ?

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -